
Luxury fashion is all about breaking codes, creating a new,
irresistible message that captivates consumers. But some of the globe’s
top brands have raised eyebrows with designs that have racist
connotations.
The latest instance of that was Italian fashion designer Gucci, which
produced a black wool balaclava sweater with an oversized collar that
pulls over the chin and nose. It includes a slit where the mouth is,
ringed with what look like giant red lips. Its similarity to blackface
prompted an instant backlash from the public and forced the company
to apologize publiclylate Wednesday.
And it’s not just the fashion labels. Adidas on Thursday apologized
and announced it was removing a running shoe from its collection
celebrating Black History Month. It did so after critics slammed the
company on social media for including the all-white shoe in a collection
Adidas said was inspired by the Harlem Renaissance.
Gucci also withdrew its offending garment from sale on websites and
stores, and said the incident would be “a powerful learning moment for
the Gucci team and beyond.”
But the question persists: How can fashion houses that thrive on detail miss such critical social cues?
Prada similarly withdrew a monkey bag charm that recalled blackface
in December, saying it “abhors racist imagery.” And Dolce & Gabbana
issued a video apology after one of the designers made insulting remarks
about the Chinese in a private chat discussing the questionable
depiction of a Chinese model in a campaign.
“Luxury brands used to be able to get away with provocative and
eccentric ads that push the boundaries of our society and culture in the
name of being creative and cutting edge,” said Qing Wang, a professor
of marketing at Warwick Business School.
“However, a long list of recent incidents have caused public outrage,
suggesting that era is now gone or that luxury brands have lost touch
with public sentiment. What used to be considered “creativity” has now
turned into “bad taste” or even “racist,” he said.
He cited other fashion fails that evoked stereotypes, including Dolce
& Gabbana’s “slave sandal” in its spring/summer 2016 collection and
a recent Burberry campaign for the Chinese New Year that was compared
to Asian horror films.
While many of these incidents have caused immediate social media
backlashes, the longer-term impact will take time to measure, and will
depend on the brands’ reaction and future sensitivity.
Dolce & Gabbana was forced to cancel its Shanghai runway show
after the insulting remarks were publicized, top Asian influencers
backed out of campaigns and Chinese websites dropped their line — a
warning sign from a region responsible for 30 percent of all global
luxury sales.
The blackface images have particular resonance in the United States
at a time when the governor of Virginia and his attorney general have
been caught up in a scandal over blackface incidents from their college
days in the 1980s. The offensive depictions are reminiscent of traveling
minstrels from the 19th Century, who would paint their faces black to
portray African characters in a ridiculous and mocking fashion,
spreading racial stereotypes along the way.
Italian sociologist Michele Sorice at Rome’s Luiss university says
that the evocation of blackface by Italian fashion houses signals “a
mixture of good faith, and ignorance.” He noted that Italian society
still wasn’t fully aware of the racial charge in some words and images.
“I imagine that they don’t truly think they are racist,” Sorice said.
“I think they didn’t have the instruments to understand that these
images are archetypes that were used to contrast the concept of
blackness and make them ridiculous. I think that many simply don’t know.
It is a cultural issue.”
Paolo Cillo, a marketing professor at Milan’s Bocconi University,
said the designer’s intent may have been taken out of context and
amplified, and she credited Gucci with acting swiftly to quell the
controversy.
“I wouldn’t stigmatize fashion,” Cillo said, comparing fashion
designer process to artistic pursuits like filmmaking, painting or
music. “There are artists in the world of culture that did more
outrageous things and no one ever said a thing. There is a perception
that fashion is ephemeral, or commercial. But from my point of view, it
is not. It reflects the times, like all other artistic forms.”
While the fashion world has been at the forefront of addressing
sexual norms — Gucci has been redefining genderless dress codes under
Alessandro Michele — it has lagged behind other industries in taking on
social issues such as racial tolerance, climate change or women’s
empowerment, according to Larry Chiagouris, a marketing professor at
Pace University.
“It is not clear why this is,” Chiagouris said, “but the evidence
clearly points to the fashion industry’s need … to catch up with the
rest of the world.”
No comments:
Post a Comment